I have following POCO class being used in EF 6.x.
My question: Why is the navigation property of 'Posts' under 'Blog' entity declared as virtual?
public class Blog
{
public int BlogId { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Url { get; set; }
public string Tags { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<Post> Posts { get; set; }
}
回答
If you define your navigation property virtual, Entity Framework will at runtime create a new class (dynamic proxy) derived from your class and uses it instead of your original class. This new dynamically created class contains logic to load the navigation property when accessed for the first time. This is referred to as "lazy loading". It enables Entity Framework to avoid loading an entire tree of dependent objects which are not needed from the database.
In some circumstances, it is best to use "Eager Loading" instead, especially if you know that you will be interacting with related objects at some point.
Julie Lerman really is the authority on all things Entity Framework, and she explains this process very well in her MSDN Article Demystifying Entity Framework Strategies: Loading Related Data
Eager loading with Include is useful for scenarios where you know in advance that you want the related data for all of the core data being queried. But remember the two potential downsides. If you have too many Includes or navigation paths, the Entity Framework may generate a poorly performing query. And you should be careful about returning more related data than necessary thanks to the ease of coding with Include.
Lazy loading very conveniently retrieves related data behind the scenes for you in response to code that simply makes mention of that related data. It, too, makes coding simpler, but you should be conscientious about how much interaction it’s causing with the database. You may cause 40 trips to the database when only one or two were necessary.
If you are developing a Web Application where every communication with the server is a new context anyway, Lazy Loading will just create unnecessary overhead to maintain the dynamic class for related objects that will never be loaded. Many people will disable lazy loading in these scenarios. Ultimately, it's still best to evaluate your SQL queries which EF has built and determine which options will perform best for the scenario you are developing under.
As I remember in EF navigation property should be virtual:
public class Blog
{
public int BlogId { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Url { get; set; }
public string Tags { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<Post> Posts { get; set; }
}But I look at EF Core and don't see it as virtual:
public class Student
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public string LastName { get; set; }
public string FirstMidName { get; set; }
public DateTime EnrollmentDate { get; set; }
public ICollection<Enrollment> Enrollments { get; set; }
}Is it not required anymore?
回答
virtual was never required in EF. It was needed only if you want lazy loading support.
Since Lazy loading is not yet supported by EF Core, currently virtual have no special meaning. It would when (and if) they add lazy loading support (there is a plan for doing so).
Update: Starting with EF Core 2.1, Lazy loading is now supported. But if you don't add Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Proxies package and enable it via UseLazyLoadingProxies, the original answer still applies.
However if you do so, the thing's totally changed due to the lack of the opt-in control in the initial implementation - it requires all your navigation properties to be virtual. Which makes no sense to me, you'd better not use that until it gets fixed. If you really need lazy loading, use the alternative Lazy loading without proxies approach, in which case again virtual doesn't matter.
Things have changed since the accepted answer was written. In 2018, Lazy Loading is now supported as of Entity Framework Core 2.1 for two different approaches.
The simpler way of the two is using proxies, and this will require the properties desired to be lazily loaded to be defined with virtual. To quote from the linked page:
The simplest way to use lazy-loading is by installing the Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Proxies package and enabling it with a call to
UseLazyLoadingProxies. [...] EF Core will then enable lazy-loading for any navigation property that can be overridden--that is, it must be virtual and on a class that can be inherited from.
And here is the provided sample code:
public class Blog
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<Post> Posts { get; set; }
}
public class Post
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Title { get; set; }
public string Content { get; set; }
public virtual Blog Blog { get; set; }
}There is another way of doing Lazy Loading without proxies, which is to inject ILazyLoader into the constructor of the data type. This is explained in here.
In short, there are two ways to perform Lazy Loading: with and without proxies. virtual is required if and only if you wish to support Lazy Loading with proxies. Otherwise, it is not.